Question 3
Prove that the following are irrationals : (i) (ii) (iii)
UNDERSTAND THE QUESTION
The problem asks to prove that each given expression cannot be written as a ratio of two integers (i.e., they are irrational). The core concept is that if a number involving a square root were rational, then the square root itself would be rational, which leads to a contradiction using the fact that √p is irrational for any prime p.
PART I
STEP 1 — ASSUME THE NUMBER IS RATIONAL
Suppose is rational. Then there exist coprime integers with such that
STEP 2 — INVERT THE EQUALITY
Taking reciprocals (both sides are non‑zero) gives
STEP 3 — SQUARE BOTH SIDES
Squaring yields
STEP 4 — PRIME‑DIVISIBILITY ARGUMENT
From we see that divides , hence divides . Write for some integer . Substituting gives
STEP 5 — CONTRADICTION WITH COPRIMENESS
Now divides , so divides . Thus both and are multiples of , contradicting the assumption that and are coprime. Hence the original assumption is false.
ANSWER
is irrational.
PART II
STEP 1 — ASSUME THE NUMBER IS RATIONAL
Suppose is rational. Then there exist coprime integers () such that
STEP 2 — ISOLATE THE SQUARE ROOT
Divide both sides by :
STEP 3 — SQUARE BOTH SIDES
Squaring gives
STEP 4 — PRIME‑DIVISIBILITY ARGUMENT
Thus is divisible by , so divides . Write . Substituting:
STEP 5 — CONTRADICTION
Now divides the right‑hand side, so divides , and because does not divide , it must divide , hence divides . Both and are multiples of , contradicting coprimeness. Therefore cannot be rational.
ANSWER
is irrational.
PART III
STEP 1 — ASSUME THE EXPRESSION IS RATIONAL
Suppose is rational. Then there exist integers with such that
STEP 2 — ISOLATE THE RADICAL TERM
Subtract from both sides:
STEP 3 — DIVIDE BY 2
Hence
STEP 4 — SQUARE BOTH SIDES
Squaring yields
STEP 5 — PRIME‑DIVISIBILITY ARGUMENT
The right‑hand side is a perfect square, so must divide . Write . Substituting gives
STEP 6 — CONTRADICTION
From we see divides the left side, so divides . Then also divides , and consequently divides and . Both numerator and denominator of the original fraction are multiples of , contradicting the assumption that the fraction was in lowest terms. Hence is irrational.
ANSWER
is irrational.
OVERALL FINAL ANSWER
COMMON MISTAKES
Assuming that multiplying an irrational number by a rational (non‑zero) factor makes it rational; the irrationality is preserved. Forgetting to reduce the assumed fraction to lowest terms before applying the prime‑divisibility argument, which leads to a false conclusion. Mis‑applying the square‑both‑sides step without checking that both sides are non‑negative; in these proofs the quantities are clearly positive, so squaring is valid.